knowledge of economic principles is, accordingly, of greater importance
than a knowledge of technical details. It will, therefore, be of interest to
consider these principles in their application to warfare.
In war the highest economy is victory, and the greatest waste is defeat;
consequently, anything which contributes to victory and evades defeat is
justifiable, however great its cost or the incidental waste involved—of
course within the limits of reason and common sense. A free and rapid
expenditure of available resources in war is not waste, but the highest
form of economy when it contributes to early victory. The march of
events is rapid in modern war. A few days, even a few hours, have decided
the issue of battle. The Commander does not ask his Engineer, "How
much will your bridge cost?" but, "How soon will it be ready?"
In civil bridge construction the essential requirements, in their usual
order of importance, are: initial cost, safety, durability or permanence,
time required for construction, and aesthetics. The time required for
construction is of importance chiefly in so far as it affects the financial
returns on the investment. A considerable time spent in design and other
preliminaries to construction, and on the work itself, will usually be amply
justified by a material saving in cost.
The Time Factor Substituted for the Cost Factor
In military construction some of these desiderata entirely disappear,
and the order of importance of others is reversed. In particular, the time
of construction becomes of paramount importance the time factor is
substituted for the cost factor as the principal consideration. In sharp
contrast to civil practice, we find that any cost will be justified, if it results
in saving of valuable time at a critical juncture. As a consequence of this,
the construction of military bridges is conducted with feverish rapidity.
The highest achievement of the military bridge builder is a structure just
sufficient for its immediate purpose, erected in the minimum time, without
undue regard for cost, appearance, or durability. Time is always the chief—often the only—consideration; delay is always inadmissible; and success is the only criterion by which the engineer will be judged.
In civil construction time is of importance; but it is seldom necessary
to sacrifice cost, safety, and all other considerations to gain time. A delay
for a moderate period will usually not be hurtful. In military operations,
on the contrary, a delay of a few days, or even a few hours, may mean
failure instead of success. A similar situation sometimes arises in civil
bridge practice, as, for example, when it is necessary to restore traffic on an
important main-line railroad after a bridge has been destroyed by fire or
flood. In such a situation the economics are similar to those of warfare;
and military methods of procedure would there be appropriate.
The Principle of "Bare Necessities Only"
Military bridges are always required in the least possible time, and there will very often, perhaps usually, be a dearth of building material.
|