making general economic investigations for arch bridges, because no two examples thereof are alike. In case of a succession of long spans in which there is a choice of rise, a tentative layout should be made using the anticipated economic ratio of rise to span-length when both substructure and
superstructure costs are considered, then the costs of piers and spans should
magnify image
![](fig26f.jpg)
be computed, the uneconomic effect of departing from the established economic ratio of rise to span-length, given in Figs. 26f to 26i, inclusive, being employed to calculate the weights of metal from those shown in
certain other diagrams.
Next, this work should be repeated for a slightly greater ratio of rise to span-length, and then for a slightly smaller ratio thereof. These three sets of computations would probably determine the best ratio to adopt;
|