of the best practice for different types of bridges that there is no great difficulty in realizing the true intent of the design in the study of the structure that must be made in the shop drawing room. It would seem to
be wise economy on the part of the designing engineer to take full advantage
of these facts.
"For full-punched work,* with splices in chords reamed to fit, it is important that the design should provide for the next larger sized rivet in the
reamed splices. This saves in the shop one handling of all the main parts,
because one size of punched holes will answer for both reamed and unreamed
holes. If, for instance, 7/8" rivets are being generally used, and allowance
is not made in the design for larger punching than 15/16", it is necessary to
punch 15/16" holes in the body of the member and rehandle all the long main
parts in order to punch a smaller-sized hole (say 13/16" diameter) at the ends
where the splice is to be reamed for fit. If allowance is made in the design
for 1 1/16" holes, the punching throughout will be 15/16" and the splices will then be reamed out to 1 1/16", thus saving the extra handling at the punch.
"In heavy, reamed girder-work where several cover plates, side plates,
and heavy flange-angles are used, the size of the sub-punched holes should
be not less than 13/16" diameter. It is difficult and expensive to fit up such
work where, because of the size of sub-punched holes, smaller fitting-up
bolts are necessary. This is because of the great difficulty in properly
pulling together such heavy parts and so many of them with 5/8" fitting-up
bolts. For work not properly brought together in fitting, the riveting is
expensive and apt to be imperfect.
"It almost goes without saying that Forge and Machine Shop work
should be kept at a minimum. Bending of long pieces is particularly
undesirable, because, when a long angle, for instance, is to be bent, the
operation of heating and bending disorganizes and interferes with all
the adjacent operations in the shop. Making a bend at each end of a
long angle, channel, or beam is not only quite expensive, but next to
impossible to do, because of the extreme difficulty in maintaining the
correct measurement between bends.
"Curving ends of girders is a considerable item of extra shop expense.
It adds to the cost of drawings, templets, laying out, punching, assembling, and riveting, in addition to the extra cost of bending the end angles.
In fact, it is doubtful if the aesthetic value is enhanced at all in proportion
to the increased price which the buyer must pay. However, where it is
decided to use 'round ends,' the exact radius of the curve should be left
to the shop detailer, so that standard bending forms may be used.
"Staggered riveting invites shop errors and slows down the work. Preference should be given to rivets placed opposite or in single rows, where the necessities of design do not require that they be staggered. The different members of a span should be designed, as far as possible, to allow
* The author is opposed, on general principles, to punching any rivet holes full size.
|