TITLE ABOUT CONTENTS INDEX GLOSSARY < PREV NEXT >
 
 
ECONOMICS OF ALLOY STEELS51

 

be done with impunity in the case of bridge metal can only be proved by actual experiments with the high alloy thus produced.

The following table gives a resume of the findings and deductions herein evolved:

TABLE 5m
Kind of SteelCost per Lb.
in Place
Average Intensity
for Tension
Carmol9.28¢ 32,700 lbs.
Chromol9.38¢42,800 lbs.
Nicmol11.48¢49,400 lbs.
Nichromol10.72¢ 40,800 lbs.
Chrovanmol12.44¢52,400 lbs.
 

 

An inspection of Table 5m shows that the Carmol and Nichromol steels are out of the running; hence it will be necessary to test the three others.

Comparing Chromol and Nicmol, we have:

 

 

From Figs. 5a and 5b we find that this product corresponds to a simple-span length of about 700 feet and to a main cantilever opening of about 1,900 feet, hence it may be concluded that, except for unusually long spans, Nicmol Steel is not as economic as Chromol steel.

Comparing Chromol and Chrovanmol, we have:

 

 

As in the last case, this is so great as to show that Chromol steel is more economic than Chrovanmol steel.

From all that precedes it is evident that the most promising combination of alloying materials for a high-grade bridge-steel is one of chromium and molybdenum; and a good analysis to test as a starter would be as follows:

Carbon0.25
Manganese0.75
Chromium0.75
Molybdenum0.75

 

 
TITLE ABOUT CONTENTS INDEX GLOSSARY < PREV NEXT >
 
Lichtenberger Engineering Library - The University of Iowa Libraries
Contact Us
© 2003 The University of Iowa