This criterion will not hold good for spans; because, while the ratio of intensities of working stresses for simple (unstiffened) tension members of untreated steel † is exactly equal to that of the elastic limits, the varying ratios of the intensities of working stresses for compression members and
for rigid tension members (on gross sections) differ materially therefrom. Moreover, a certain portion of the weight of metal in a structure is not affected by varying the intensities of working stresses. Again, the criterion would take no cognizance of the reduction of dead load due to the smaller weight of steel involved by using the alloy. The first and second of the variations mentioned are of opposite sign from the third, and, in consequence, the tendency of the combination is to offset; but the preponderance, except in the case of unusually long spans, is in favor of the
* After this chapter was completed, its contents were used as a basis for a paper
presented to the Académie des Sciences of France, entitled "L'Émploi Économique des
Alliages d'Acier pour la Construction des Ponts," all quantities in both diagrams and
text being changed to French units. The paper was published in condensed form by
the Academy on July 12, 1920, and in full by Le Génie Civil on July 24, 1920.
† In the case of eye-bars of treated steel, the intensity of working tensile stress is taken as either one-half of the elastic limit or one-third of the ultimate strength—whichever of the two is the smaller.
26
|