|
Emblematic Influences:
Literature/Drama and Medals/Coins
Charlotte Brontë uses
an emblematic discourse in Jane Eyre (1847), constructing verbal
images that reference or are similar to the visual images that appear
in emblems. Helena Ardholm claims that Brontë applies emblematic
discourses to expose the hidden spiritual nature of the obstacles Jane
must over come before she can be united with Rochester (104-5). This appears
throughout the novel with the motif of the caged bird—representing
the soul. Francis Quarles’s Emblemes (1639) also has an
emblem with a man—representing the soul—imprisoned in a birdcage.
Though there is no way to prove that the emblem was a direct source for
Brontë, she was familiar with emblem books and other similarly illustrated
didactic books present in the family library. Her religious background
can be associated with the tendencies of this genre of literature as well
(Ardholm 60-61). See Helena Ardholm for
more information on emblematic discourse in both Charlotte and Emily Brontë’s
works. |
| 
The birdcage motif first
appears when Rochester says to Jane: “I see at intervals the
glance of a curious sort of bird through the close-set bars of a
cage: a vivid, restless, resolute captive is there; were it but
free, it would soar cloud-high.” Continuing, Ardholm points
out how Rochester describes Jane, which evokes the image of a caged
soul: “Consider that eye: consider the resolute, wild, free
thing looking out of it, defying me, with more than courage--with
a stern triumph. Whatever I do with its cage, I cannot get at it—the
savage beautiful creature! Conqueror I might be of the house; but
the inmate would escape to heaven before I could call myself possessor
of its clay dwelling-place. And it is you, spirit—with will
and energy, and virtue and purity—that I want: not alone your
brittle frame. Of yourself you could come with soft flight and nestle
against my heart, if you would...”(Both citations from Brontë
in Ardholm, 97). |
|
|
Many critics have found
similarities in Shakespeare’s works and emblem books, suggesting
that he too was aware of emblems, though they may have just been
one of many indirect sources. In this instance, Falstaff, in Shakespeare’s
Merry Wives of Windsor (1602), impersonates Actaeon, a
hunter who is changed into a stag by Diana and is then killed by
his own hounds, from classical mythology. The way Falstaff is portrayed—wearing
the disguise of a stag’s head and hunter’s clothing—is
almost identical to the pictures of Actaeon in several emblem books,
including those in Alciati and Sambucus shown here. |
|

In addition to mere replication
of myth, a similarity of posture exists in an emblem by Sambucus
and the description in Shakespeare—Falstaff decides to “winke,
and couche.” In an emblem book by Whitney, the interpretation
of the emblem is also very similar to Shakespeare’s presentation
of Faltaff's character. John Daly paraphrases John Steadman’s
observation that “the emblematic value of any scene or character
depends upon its visual impact and the facility with which the audience
can interpret the meaning of the visual experience” (Daly
156). Thus, the audience’s knowledge of both the myth and
the emblem gives added depth to the scene and the character. |
|
| 
During the Renaissance,
medals were frequently struck to commemorate and celebrate the deeds
and accomplishments of great men. Though they only include two parts
of the emblem similar to devices, they are incorporated in some
emblem books: here by Hungarian Johannes Sambucus (left) and also
in a compilation by the German Universität Altdorf (below). |
|
| Though
Special Collections does not have any commerative medals from the
Renaissance, there is a nice collection of French medals from the
Revolution of 1848. Something as simple as the emblematic quality
of today's quarter dollar derives from commerative medals and their
linkage to emblematic ideas, which in turn demonstrates the long
history of image as allegory and illustration. This exhibit is only
a sampling of how emblem books and their discourse can be applied
to many areas of study by using our mind’s eye for interpretation.
Emblem books were only one of the many evolving forms combining
image and text, but one that had an influential impact on many of
the viewing and reading methods we take for granted today.
|
|
|
|